Thank you very much, Mark, and welcome everybody to our first quarter 2021 earnings conference call and webcast presentation. Here in Stockholm, we have our Chairman, President, and CEO, Jan Carlson, our new Chief Financial Officer, Ray Pekar, and myself, Thomas Jönsson, Communications and IR. During today's call, Jan will comment on our current business highlights and provide an update on our launches and technology. Ray will walk you through our financial results and provide some commentary on the 2021 outlook. We'll remain on the line for Q&A session. As usual, the slides and earnings release are available through a link on the homepage of our corporate website. Moving to the next page, we have the safe harbor statement, which is an integrated part of this presentation and includes any Q&A that follows here today. During the presentation, we will reference some non-U.S. GAAP measures, and the reconciliations of these figures are disclosed in our quarterly press release and the 10-K that will be published with the SEC. This call is intended to conclude at 3:00 P.M. CT, so please limit yourself to two questions. That way we can work as many questions in as possible. With that, I'll turn it over to our Chief Executive Officer, Jan Carlson. Jan, please. Thank you, Thomas, and welcome to all of you from my side as well. Now, turning the page. On this page, we have the business highlights for the first quarter. We continue to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic very closely, with our first priority the health and safety of our associates, thereby reinforcing the measures that we put in place at the beginning of the pandemic while we are adapting to the current situation. At the beginning of the quarter, we took a cautious view on light vehicle production based on our customer call-offs, which overall proved to be directionally correct. While the global light vehicle production growth was essentially in line with the IHS forecast at the beginning of the quarter, the regional mix shifted significantly. I will elaborate that further on this geographic mix shift on the next slide. Our strong 17% organic sales growth for the first quarter outperformed the global light vehicle production by 4 percentage points. Based on our full-year outlook, we expect our organic sales growth to accelerate and anticipate an outperformance versus light vehicle production in the mid-teens in percentage terms for 2021. Semiconductor supply constraints continue to create delivery and cost challenges for our industry. This, together with our continued buildup for growth, adds temporary cost to our operations, which we were able to offset by the efficiencies from our Market Adjustment Initiative program. Through these costs and cash control initiatives, we ended the quarter with a strong cash balance of $645 million. Additionally, during the quarter, we added a new global joint venture customer in China, which includes our 4th generation mono vision perception software and also radar. This is an important step as China, over the coming years, is expected to be a growth engine for the active safety market. Overall, a successful quarter for Veoneer, despite the continued underlying market uncertainties and volatility. Looking more into the light vehicle production development on the next slide. As mentioned, our cautious view towards the light vehicle production heading into the quarter proved to be right. The global LVP decreased with approximately 0.5 percentage points from the IHS Markit January forecast and decreased sequentially by approximately 14% from the fourth quarter. The overall light vehicle production growth overshadows the significant shift in the regional mix. As compared to IHS expectations from the beginning of the quarter, the light vehicle production in North America and Europe, which makes up more than 75% of Veoneer's sales, were down close to 14% and 3% respectively. While China, which makes up 28% of the global LVP, but only 13% of Veoneer sales, was up 11%. This geographic mix shift had temporary adverse effect on our organic sales growth and gross margin during the first quarter. For Veoneer, our content per vehicle in Europe and North America is approximately four times higher as compared to China. For active safety, it can be up to 10x higher. We expect this active safety's mixed effect will improve in the future as our active safety's organic sales growth accelerates. Looking ahead into the second quarter, the light vehicle production is expected to decline sequentially by approximately 2 percentage points from Q1, which reflects a 60% year-over-year increase. For the full year 2021, an increase of approximately 12% from 2020 is expected, reaching around 80 million vehicles produced compared to 72 million vehicles produced in 2020. Volatility uncertainty is likely to remain high as semiconductor shortages are expected to continue at least through the second quarter and linger into the second half of 2021. Turning the page. Just like 2020, 2021 is a very important launch year for Veoneer. The launches reflected on this slide reflect $300 million of annual sales. This comes after 2020, when new launches also represented around $300 million of annual sales. Executing well on these two years is key for us to achieve the midterm target of the $2.5 billion in sales in 2023, and I'm pleased to say that we are well on track. During the first quarter, we saw virtually no slippage of launches despite the challenging industry environment. According to our launch schedule, we will, at the end of this year, have launched eight vehicle platforms from six different OEMs with our 4th generation vision, including our in-house developed perception algorithms. We are making good progress, as highlighted, and looking on the next page. We have, over the last few months, seen strong customer and technology progress for Veoneer. In March, Polestar 2, which runs the current generation of Arriver software, became the number one car in Euro NCAP safety test. This is an important proof point that we are on track to create the leading global challenger for ADAS software. Our collaboration with Qualcomm is progressing very well, and Arriver, our recently launched ADAS and AD software unit, is well on track with the first functions running on the Qualcomm Snapdragon platform, and we have so far had discussions with eight tier ones and around 20 OEMs. Mercedes EQS DRIVE PILOT system contains Veoneer's 4th generation stereo vision camera system, comprised by fully integrated hardware and perception software to master the challenges of highly automated driving. The system also contains Veoneer's advanced 77 GHz radar operating at a distance up to 150 m with high range resolution and supreme angular accuracy. All in all, solid progress. We are ready to take on advanced active safety systems and integration programs, two areas that are key to OEMs and will drive the market for many years. I stop here for my formal presentations and turn it over now to Ray for the financial highlights. Please, Ray. Thank you, Jan. Looking now to the financial highlights on the next slide. We are pleased with our continued strong organic sales growth of 17% during the first quarter, which represents a growth over market of approximately 4 percentage points. Net sales for the quarter of $419 million were in line with our internal expectations at the beginning of the quarter. The strong sales performance and our ongoing MAI program resulted in an operating loss of $104 million, which includes extra costs of approximately $5 million related to the supply chain disruptions and a currency headwind of approximately $7 million. Our strong cash position of $645 million at the end of the quarter was essentially in line with our expectations at the beginning of the quarter, due to our continued strong cash flow focus. Also, in this fast-changing environment, we continue to identify opportunities to reduce our investments for growth without compromising future launches, as illustrated by the $15 million capital expenditure reduction year-over-year in our engineering cost control. Overall, solid performance during the first quarter as we prepare for continued organic sales growth and make strategic investments for the future. Looking further into the first quarter details on the next slide. Our sales increase of $57 million for the quarter was mainly due to the organic sales growth of $59 million as compared to the prior year. The organic sales increase was across all major product areas, where RCS organic growth was $19 million or 11%, the active safety organic growth was $29 million or 18%, and the organic growth for the other brake ECUs was $13 million. In addition, the net currency translation impact of $22 million essentially offset the VNBS Asia divestiture impact of $24 million. Our gross profit improvement from the organic sales growth and net currency effect for the quarter were somewhat mitigated by supply chain disruptions of approximately $5 million and a step-up in production overhead of approximately $10 million, which supports the buildup of our strong organic sales growth. Our RD&E net of $117 million decreased by $14 million during the quarter due to lower gross costs and the brake systems divestiture benefit of $15 million, which were partially offset by the additional costs related to Zenuity of approximately $13 million. In addition, the SG&A improvement year-over-year of $5 million more than offset the restructuring cost of $2 million. Lastly, our operating cash flow of - $110 million for the quarter was $101 million lower than last year, where the year-over-year EBITDA improvement was more than offset by the change in net working capital. Looking now to our sequential performance on the next slide. Sequentially, our net sales decreased $36 million or 10% as compared to the fourth quarter last year, primarily due to the decline in the underlying LVP, which declined sequentially by 14%. Our sequential organic sales decline of $43 million or 9%, including $34 million in RCS and $10 million in active safety, was partially offset by negative currency effects of approximately $7 million. Sequentially, the operating loss increase was mainly due to organic sales decline impact on gross profit, some extra costs related to the supply chain disruptions, the seasonality impact of our RD&E, and net currency effects. Lastly, our operating cash flow decreased sequentially by $33 million, primarily due to the lower EBITDA and net working capital increase, which was mostly due to the capital gain tax payment of approximately $20 million. Looking now to our outlook on the next slide. Our outlook for 2021 remains unchanged from the beginning of the year. Our full year 2021 indication is for net sales to increase by more than 30% as compared to 2020, where we expect our organic sales growth to exceed 25%, along with a currency translation tailwind of approximately 3%. We also expect our organic sales growth for 2021 will outperform the underlying LVP in the mid-teens in percentage terms. As a result of our market adjustment initiatives program and strong organic sales growth, we expect our RD&E net to be in the range of $110 million-$120 million per quarter during 2021, our operating loss is expected to improve in 2021 as compared to 2020, despite certain headwinds. Capital expenditures remain to be expected around $100 million in 2021, we estimate our cash balance to be more than $400 million at year-end 2021. Lastly, for 2021, we expect our operating loss and cash flow performance to improve sequentially during the year, as we expect our operating leverage on our organic sales growth will improve during the second half of 2021. Overall, a continued positive momentum in our outlook, especially in this very mixed and uncertain macro environment. Now I'll turn the call back over to Jan. Thank you, Ray. Turning the page, this concludes our formal comments for today's earnings call. Before we open up for Q&A, I would like to extend a sincere thank you to the entire Veoneer team for their dedication and strong execution with a continued sharp focus on health and safety, quality, and value creation. The team remained focused on launching new technologies and customer programs during very difficult conditions, continuing in the first quarter of this year. By that, I would like to turn it over to the operator, Mark, to moderate our Q&A session. Mark, please go ahead. Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Hampus Engellau of Handelsbanken. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you very much. Two questions from me. My first question is relating to the quarter. We've seen light vehicle production being changed, call-offs being changed. I have picked up from some sub-suppliers that some OEMs have chosen to take delivery from suppliers and sub-suppliers, even though they have taken stop weeks because they see the underlying demand, and they fear having shortages on other components for the remainder of the year. My question to you guys is that have some of your customers still taking delivery from you despite stopping production on the back of semi shortages? Second question is related to Arriver. Very interesting press releases from you on this. Could you maybe talk a little bit about where you are in terms of actually having this as a product now, and have OEMs started to test the Arriver software in the Snapdragon chip? In that process, have you seen new OEMs that are customers to Qualcomm that haven't been customers to Veoneer prior to that? Thanks. I can take the first question. We have seen some rare occasions of customers taking products, and we have seen that customers are parking cars not being completely finished. That has happened. I cannot quantify anything of it, but we have seen that happening during the quarter. When it comes to Arriver, we are in the process, as I mentioned, we have the software running on the Snapdragon chip. We are expecting to put this in vehicles to be able to demonstrate this during this quarter, as we expect to do demonstrations to customers during the quarter and thereafter to evolve further into customer engagement and customer activities throughout second half of the year. I also mentioned here in the formal text here that we have an interaction with approximately ballpark 20 OEMs and around eight tier ones. That is a discussion that is not only Veoneer having, but there is Qualcomm being involved, and Qualcomm having that discussion. Among those 20 OEMs, yes, there are OEMs that we don't have as customers directly today that are involved in it. That is as much as I can say about it. There is a strong customer interest based on that we have only been able to demonstrate this more visually rather than practically in cars from customers. They are, of course, eager to see it in reality. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Emmanuel Rosner of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yes, thank you very much. Could you give us a sense of how much impact you expect the semi shortages or supply chain issues to have over the rest of the year? Should things improve in the second and third quarter versus what you've seen in the first, or will the second quarter still be a large headwind? Yeah, I think when we look into the second quarter here, we expect the semi issue to continue somewhat. I think at the end of the day, the releases continue to be quite volatile and changing quite frequently as we saw during the first quarter here. I wouldn't say that we expect it to get worse during the second quarter, but we expect it to continue into the second quarter, and I think it remains to be seen now, how quickly this could recover during the second half of the year. Generally speaking, I think the OEMs tend to be a little bit more optimistic on the recovery, but, as we know, the numbers are changing quite dramatically here. Continue into the second quarter, and it's still uncertain how much it will recover during the second half. Okay. Second question, your order intake took a step down, I guess, the last 12 months, order intake took a step down as of the end of the first quarter. You also indicated solid confidence in essentially being able to grow it over the full year. Can you tell us what are you seeing that gives you this confidence? The timing, I guess, of some of these orders? I think we commented on that already after our fourth quarter earnings release that the order intake will be back end loaded in 2021. The leads and the prospects that we are targeting here and the progress we are targeting and the RFQs have such an award pattern that it will fall into second half of any major substance. You are seeing this somewhat lower last 12-month order intake now for first quarter. As I said, it's in second half we expect this to come back. Some of it here in first quarter might have been slightly lower than we anticipated in the beginning of the quarter, but that is due to the chip shortages. Some of the boards have been slightly pushed out. To Ray's point here, your first question here about how long that will remain, we don't know yet. Maybe even somewhat lower than we expected in the beginning of the year, but we don't see that we have had any losses that we haven't counted for here during the quarter. This is more or less in line fully with what we expected in the beginning of the year, structurally, and to be back end loaded like this. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Aileen Smith at Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for taking the questions. First question, in terms of the outperformance versus global light vehicle production, what factors specifically would you point to as driving an acceleration in growth above market from what was 4% in the first quarter to something that we would estimate in the double-digit range in the back half of the year if we're going to get to that mid-teens target that you provided for the full year? Is it a function of normalization in mix and revenue contribution across regions, or is it more so a function of product launches? Just trying to figure out what's in your control versus not. Yeah, I would say it's more of a normalization of the mix, during the second half of the year in particular, I would say. As we indicated here in the first quarter, all of the LVP growth came from China. With our sales, less than 15% of our sales being in China, and the CPV being lower in China as well, that clearly has a negative impact on the mix for Veoneer. Based on the outlook, we expect that to shift and to change during the second half of the year in particular, and perhaps even somewhat during the second quarter here as well. Great. That is very helpful. A second question, longer term around Arriver. As you think about trying to sell more software into OEMs on a direct level, is there anything in the Arriver agreement that precludes you from selling software onto SoCs other than Qualcomm Snapdragon? Apologies if this is kind of a rudimentary question, but is your software development agnostic to SoCs, or is it designed in any specific way for Snapdragon? We are developing this in a collaboration with Qualcomm, and we will focus to work with Qualcomm here. It's a little bit of a mute question for the time being. We're starting off this collaboration and working very hard to make our software run on the Snapdragon platform and focusing all our efforts and get that up and running. We are doing that because we think this is a very competitive offer. It's a very compelling financially cost-wise, performance-wise, scale-wise, offer in this industry, and that gives superior value to customers, and that's why we're focusing on Qualcomm. Perfect. Thank you very much for taking the question. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Erik Golrang of SEB. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you. I have two questions, and the first one coming back to what you said on Arriver, those discussions with eight OEMs and 20 tier ones. What's the feedback so far? What do they say? "If we go with you, it's going to be for this and that reason." What are you presenting that they feel is unique and attractive? Then the second question, on leverage. I guess the 2023 ambitions you put out last quarter would reflect around 30% incremental margins through that period, which was where they were in Q1. Q2, I assume, we'll see a big step back because of the R&D development there last year, meaning that to be at that level for the full year, we should see incrementals well above that in the second half. Is that the right way of thinking? Maybe I'll take the latter question first on the leverage, and Jan can take the Arriver question. I think regarding the leverage, I think coming back to what we said on the year-end earnings call there back in February, we talked about operating leverage at the gross margin line of, call it around 20%. We still hold to that. Now, when you look at what happens here in the first quarter, we have two headwinds, right? You've got the $5 million related to the supply chain disruptions. In addition to that, during the first quarter, when you're comparing year-over-year, we have a step-up in production overhead also of about $10 million. Those two things are what really holds back the leverage here in the first quarter. We expect that to improve sequentially throughout the year. I think if we end the year closer to the 20% number, that would indicate maybe the second half of the year could be a little bit above the 20%. If I continue with the unique selling points on the Arriver side, I think what is compelling to customers here is it is an open type of architecture that allows additional functionalities coming from the OEMs into the system. It is a scalable architecture, covering entry-level up to high-level. It is high-performing, which is low power consumptions and high performance rates in the system that is compelling. Also cost-wise, this is a very competitive offer that is interesting for customers. I think also customers have seen and worked with Qualcomm on other areas in the car, in connectivity, in infotainment areas, et cetera, and been used to work with Qualcomm in other functionalities and can now see that also being extended into ADAS, which is another thing that is giving customers an interest in this combination. Several areas of interest. I think it's now very wanted by many of the OEMs to see this in-car in reality as the next step. Thanks. Just one follow-up, if I may, on the order intake, given the slow development early in the year, you say it's going to be back-end loaded. On your expectations, are there very few, very big orders that's going to be super important for you to win? Can you lose a couple and you still end up getting a high number for the full year? How risky is the tender backlog? It's not like you need all and everyone, but these orders that we are targeting here are substantial orders, and they are important for us, and they are then coming to the schedule in the second half of the year. That is an important piece of us, as always when we have taken orders also in our history. If you look to the radar areas, I think we have a quite big lead base in the radar area and the RCS area as well. Also here, when it comes to the vision area, it's really twofold. If you look to the vision system, it's somewhat in the generation where many customers are interested in our next generation, in our 5th generation camera together with Qualcomm, that is probably looking for start of production maybe 2024 or 2025 timeframe. When you look to the 4th generation, there is also there an interest in more of predominantly coming also from Europe and the regulatory environment, the General Safety Regulation that is going to be mandatory with camera technologies for autonomous emergency braking, et cetera, here by the 2022-2023 timeframe. There is an interest, and that is more of the normal type of business that we are looking for on existing generations. That is on the vision side. We are targeting all of these, and of course, the 5th generation, the bigger, the ones that are looking for a Qualcomm situation are by nature bigger and bigger awards and important awards for us for several aspects. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of James Picariello at KeyBanc Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, guys. It looks like the chip shortage or supply chain disruption impact was $5 million in the quarter. How should we be thinking about how that plays out in the second quarter, the remainder of the year? It sounds as though, from the press release commentary, the company's baking in a strong, near full recovery related to the semiconductor situation in the back half. Can you just elaborate on what that assumes relative to IHS Markit's April forecast for the back half? Thanks. I think more or less for the second half of this year, we are assuming the IHS forecast. For the current quarter, where we indicate that we'll outperform the light vehicle production both year-over-year and sequentially, that's more geared towards our call-offs. Certainly, I think to the extent that IHS is looking for the LVP to recover during the second half of the year, we certainly have that factored into our outlook as well. I think what we should keep in mind is that when you look at the LVP in the third quarter, it's essentially flattish from the second quarter. Then you have a step-up coming in the fourth quarter, which is very similar to, I guess, what we saw last year, where we had a record LVP during the fourth quarter here. From a cost perspective, we have factored in that we would anticipate some additional costs also related to supply chain here, in particular during the second quarter, I would say. Okay. Got it. Within the company's trailing 12-month order intake of the $400 million, can you just share what the breakout is between active safety and restraint controls? Yeah, I think if you look at the trailing 12, it is somewhere between 75%-80% would be the active safety, and then the remainder would be the restraint controls, which is a little bit higher than the mix of the order book. I think when you look at the order book, we talk more like two-thirds of the order book is in the active safety versus restraint controls. Got it. If I could just ask a housekeeping item, what was the $7 million equity income gain in the quarter? Just curious. Thanks. That was related to the investment that we have in Autotech. That was just a bookkeeping issue whereby we had to record a gain on the market value of that investment. Non-cash. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Johnson at Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Good afternoon over there. I noticed on the launch that Jeep Grand Cherokee includes night vision. I guess both a tactical question then a more strategic one. Is that just on the upper trim levels? I know they have a very upper-end trim level for that. Then second, what does that say about the acceptance of night vision beyond the luxury market? Third, midterm, with increased concern about nighttime pedestrian safety, especially in Europe, do you see a route for NCAP maybe not mandating night vision, but making the standards for nighttime pedestrian detection tough enough that night vision comes much more into the picture? Well, I guess, first of all, the thermal sensing night vision, as you call it here, is a superior sensor when it comes to putting additional information to typical normal vision cameras or radars. It has a very long distance to sense the object. It is using a different technology, as you all know. I think there has a good future for higher level of autonomy, and we see there is an increased interest. This has been around for 10, 15 years, and we have sold this product for a number of years, but it has always been on a niche level. There is a somewhat increased interest now from the industry coming from the point you're mentioning here in towards the higher level of autonomy. If you look to the Jeep Cherokee here, that is on the upper trim level. To your point, it's not a standard in the vehicle, but we are seeing, as I mentioned, several OEMs showing interest in this and also more directed car companies having an interest more for robotaxi solutions, et cetera, also for equipping the vehicles with this. Remains to be seen where it's going. We keep developing it, and we keep putting this also as a dedicated product area in our organization to take care of that interest when it's coming. Okay, just as a follow-up, infrared's also used for driver monitoring. Is that something you're looking at as well? Far it has predominantly been radar, but also vision inside the vehicle. Could, of course, be done with thermal sensing as well. As of right now, I think the cost efficiency of the other technologies has been superior. Okay, thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Agnieszka Vilela of Nordea. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you. First, I would like to ask you about the $5 million costs related to the supply chain. Can you explain what it is for in detail? Is it because of the higher prices of microchips, or is it because of the more expensive freight? Also, do you see a chance to get this kind of cost inflation back through price increases to your customers? Thanks. Yeah. Related to the $5 million, that's mostly related to the premium freight. That would be predominantly on inbound, but it could also be some outbound premium freight there. As you can imagine, we have ongoing discussions with both suppliers and our customers when it comes to this. To make any commitments on how that will end up being resolved, it's too early to make any prediction on that. We continue to work this with both the supply base and the customers. Great. Thank you. Then can you give us some color on the $10 million higher production overhead costs? What you're doing there, and also should we expect this higher cost level to continue in the coming quarters? Maybe in connection with that, are you planning for any more kind of cost savings program, or is it more put on hold right now when you need to ramp up production to the new launches? Thanks. Yeah. When we talk about the production overhead, this is kind of a step up to a new production overhead level cost to support the growth that we have coming on here during 2021. We wouldn't expect this to continue to increase sequentially in any material way throughout the year. Of course, there could be some further step up towards the end of the year preparing into 2022. For the time being, we stick with what we have. The two main contributors to that cost increase is really related to your indirect labor, personnel costs, as well as the depreciation for the equipment. Those are the two main drivers, I would say, of that cost increase. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dan Levy of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. First, just wanted to follow up on the gross margin in the quarter. Appreciate the commentary on the premium freight, and some of the overhead. Maybe you could talk about, you did have obviously some business launching, and you have additional business launching over the course of the year. What type of incremental margin or contribution margin you got on the launches in 1Q, and maybe what you anticipate over the course of the year, and what that says about the broader gross margin outlook? Well, I think you could do the backwards math. The contribution or the leverage, I guess net leverage was, call it around 10% or so, maybe even slightly below that. When you take into consideration the overhead, the $10 million on overhead that I mentioned, as well as the $5 million on the supply chain, you're talking about a leverage of well above 20%. Again, the contribution is there on the new business. That's clear. It's just a matter of navigating through some of these extra costs that we're incurring for the time being. As I mentioned earlier, we expect the leverage on gross margin to be in the ballpark of 20% for the year. That's kind of how we're looking at things evolving, and we'll come back at a future time as to when we could expect that to be higher than that. We stick to the 20% for now. Just on that, the margin on a program over its lifetime, maybe you could give us a sense of directionally, when you launch, it sounds like your contribution margins are okay, but how does that margin maybe change or vary over the lifetime of a program? Yeah, I don't think we should get into the details of how things will evolve, I think, program by program. I think at the end of the day, as we mentioned here, as growth comes on, you do have to, at various steps, you make a step-up in your fixed costs or your overhead costs to support that growth. The growth doesn't come for free, unfortunately. There is some cost that you have to continue to layer in. Beyond that, I think we're not going to get into program by program how contribution evolves. Okay, great. My second question is, just a couple of weeks ago, we saw a headline, Volvo, I think they're expanding their collaboration with NVIDIA, and they're taking on more compute. I recognize there's multiple ways you can work with a given customer, but maybe you could provide some color on how does this at all impact your future collaboration with Volvo? Maybe you could just talk more broadly also about whether automakers are taking a more active role in forming their active safety functionality versus relying on suppliers. What does that headline imply for you and just more broadly, how the relationship is going with customers as customers are trying to take on some of their own functionality? Volvo, you're correct. Volvo has gone out and said they are going to do with their next architecture based on an NVIDIA chip and an NVIDIA architecture overall. Long term, it remains to be seen how that is affecting us. Short-, mid-term, we are just starting to roll out our existing architecture on the Volvo cars. We will have a longer-lasting relationship with Volvo, and we have had a long-lasting relationship with Volvo historically, and we will have that for years to come. I think that it remains to be seen on how it's playing out when we have our Qualcomm architecture up for demonstration, and when that is out and put into cars, how that is received also by Volvo. We will, of course, show them what we can offer there as well when, and we have had discussions, but we will have more discussions when it's up and running in vehicles. I think generally speaking, car makers are taking more active role into how the architecture is being formed. You can read that several car makers are hiring their own software engineers to do a lot more work in-house. That is not valid for all car makers. Some car makers are still relying more onto OEMs and/or ecosystems on tier ones, ecosystems of tier ones. I think that will be the case going forward. As I said, we had 20 different discussions, Qualcomm and Arriver ongoing on our alternative on our architecture, and we will then be able to maybe from Veoneer to be an integrator of that and do more of the work, or in some case, the OEMs will do more of the work. That is going to be different from OEMs to OEMs. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Next question comes from the line of José Asumendi of J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Thanks very much. Afternoon. José from J.P. Morgan. Just a few items, please. The first one, can you talk a little bit about the regional mix or geographical mix? Are you seeing signs of improvement April, May trends? We're already nearing to May. Are you seeing signs of improvement as Europe and North America picking up speed? Also, can you speak a little bit about RCS? Do you see any specific region that can drive the growth in the coming quarters? Second question, I guess for Ray. As we think about the seasonality of the business over the coming quarters, do you think the losses have peaked in the first quarter? Is this how we should be thinking about it from a budget perspective? Jan, can you talk a little bit more about Arriver and I guess a little bit on the timing, like in this RFQ process and the discussions with the OEMs, are we months away, quarters away, or a year away from some orders? As I think about sort of the complete ADAS system, Qualcomm has some very good relations also with all suppliers, all the friend suppliers. As I think about the overall ADAS hardware and sensor suite, do you think you could consider maybe a situation where you could change the structure of Arriver to bring in new suppliers to create a much more rounded ADAS product? Is this something that you would not consider strategically for the company? Thank you. That was many questions. Ray, should you start? Yeah. Maybe I'll take the RCS question and the question about the loss. I think when we look at the RCS development throughout the year, again, we've given you some ideas on how the active safety will develop growth-wise, so you can kind of back into the RCS. We do expect the RCS to grow above market throughout the year. In percentage terms, we haven't disclosed that information, but we certainly expect it to continue to grow above market, and that's coming from all geographies. It's not just coming from any one particular geography, I would say. Regarding the operating loss, I think I go back to the comment that I made in the prepared remarks related to we expect a sequential improvement throughout the year, both in cash flow performance as well as the operating loss performance. I guess does that mean that the peak would be in the loss would be in Q1? I guess you could imply that, but we haven't come out and specifically said that at this point. If we look into the mix, if you look to the IHS numbers, it appears that for second quarter compared to what we thought in January, what they projected in January, China is somewhat down. Of course, that all compared to chip shortages and compared to also that they were earlier through the pandemic situation, and they had a different situation there. We expect the mix situation, depending on the availability of chips, to continue to be down, even though it's recovering year-over-year due to very easy comparables from last year. We expect the chip shortages to have an effect for us in also in second quarter and then to abate into second half of the year. We believe this will correct itself, and that's why we also based those on the launches that we are seeing and on the new products we are bringing into the market. We are reiterating our guidance for the year. When it comes to Arriver and when it comes to tweaking the Arriver collaboration and seeking other opportunities, I think I mentioned that earlier, our focus is now to work with Qualcomm. Our focus is to make the demonstrations up and running to the vehicles, and then to take that good start that we have with all the discussions on different OEMs, 20 OEMs and eight tier ones, and to bring that into orders. You asked when we would get the results coming out of it. We are still positive and optimistic that we will see awards during 2021. We are holding on to that, and then we will see how much and how that will play out. Optimistic to take awards in this year. Excellent. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Kelley at Jefferies. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hi, good afternoon, thanks for taking my questions. You referenced the 4th generation system win in China. I was just hoping you could provide a bit more detail on that opportunity, your role in that platform, and then maybe how we should think about potential timing of that rollout. If we are looking on the new orders, we believe that is a first order of something that can grow, and that we should expect to see further follow-on orders to this one. As we said in the prepared remarks, it's a global joint venture OEM in China that has awarded us this business. At this stage, it's very early, I don't want to give you a lot of more colors onto it. We believe this is an important step for this joint venture customer for us to get this order. It has, as I said, follow-on orders to come. I could maybe mention that this brings that up to our night vision customer award that we have. Okay. Got it. Thank you. Maybe just a quick follow-up there, assuming I believe includes vision, perception, software, and radar. As far as a systems opportunity, that's what you're referencing when you mention the follow-up order opportunity as well. You think it's more of a systems-based approach go forward? Yes. It would be more follow-on orders on the architecture that we are starting up with here. You never know what that can lead to then when we are coming in as a supplier to this joint venture customer. This is a new joint venture customer for us, and if we are then playing this well and they are happy with what we are giving them now, that may lead to something else. That's speculation, so we will have to come back to that if it happens. I just want to note that. Okay. Got it. Thank you. Okay, sorry. About five minutes left, and we have time for maybe one or two more questions. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Itay Michaeli of Citi. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Great. Thanks, everybody. Good afternoon. Just two quick ones for me on the 2023 outlook. First, could you just remind us what kind of order intake you will need this year to get it to 2023 revenue target, or are you already believe you're fully booked there? Then second, Ray, you mentioned the incremental gross margins are about 20%. Is that what you need to get to profitability in 2023, or does that have to accelerate from here? Thank you. I can take the first piece. It's around 95% of the orders that are booked to get to the $2.5 billion we are indicating for 2023. On the latter part, just to clarify, I think when we talk about leverage on the gross profit, the contribution margin is actually higher than the 20%. The 20% is what the net effect is on the gross profit line once you factor in your additional cost of goods sold and production overhead, which is in addition to your direct material, which is where the contribution calculation comes from, of course. I think for us, the contribution is higher than the 20%. I think historically, we have talked about a range of 25%-35% contribution margin, generally speaking. I think when we talk about the net leverage, we're really talking around the 20% level for now. Got it. Ray, is that 20% net leverage sufficient to get to 2023 profitability? Yeah. We haven't given any further details on how the leverage will evolve into 2021 or into 2022 and 2023 at this point. Okay, great. Thanks so much. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Vijay Rakesh of Mizuho. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Yeah. Hi, guys. Just wondering on the Qualcomm Arriver. How should we look at ASPs on some of the newer components that you're pushing there, how does that compare to your current ASP trends? Could you repeat the question, Vijay, please? Yeah, just the content for Veoneer on the Arriver platforms with Qualcomm. Well, the content for Veoneer will, of course, then when the customer program so will be set up for it, be an integrator of the Veoneer Qualcomm solution. It would be put on a type of ADAS ECU, and then we will supply an ADAS ECU with surround components to it, and probably also with cameras and radar sensors into it as it's a natural part of it. That will be one thing. Otherwise, inside Veoneer, the whole software pack from Arriver, it's a part of Veoneer. Got it. As you look at your order backlog, I know you mentioned it should pick up nicely into back half. Just wondering if we get back to 2019 levels. Thanks. We aren't giving more indications that we are saying that we expect order intake for 2021 to be higher than 2020. We will probably see how that is developing then as we report LTMs over the quarters to come. I'm stressing again here now, being a bit into the second quarter, that it is in second half, we are expecting the bigger order wins here. Got it. Great. Thanks a lot. Thank you. Thank you. As we're close to time, I'll hand back to our speakers for the closing comments. Thank you very much, Mark. I also would then like to thank everybody for your participation and your interesting and thoughtful questions today. Now looking ahead, our next quarterly earnings call is tentatively planned for July. We'll come back to you at a later stage with the date. Also would like to remind you about the Capital Market Day that we have been talking about. We'll come back to that also with a firm date sometime during third quarter. Thank you very much for today, and I wish you until then a good and healthy spring, and stay healthy, and a good pre-summer until we talk next time. Thank you very much all of you.